dominant wife slave husband - Salacious shemale wife taking pleasure from

dominant wife slave husband
Salacious shemale wife taking pleasure from ass-banging her eager husband

Get instant access to Shemale Weddings!

Suggestions

	Butts probed and bodies waxed in kinky CFNM play cfnm forum
	Hot babes playing strip surgery transsexual surgery
	Luscious Latin mamasita Alice peels off her panties and fingers herself. pee in panties
	Tranny brunette rides purple vibe brunette models
	Teen whore gets ass fucked by her pimp tight ass teen
	Black sluts fuck each other to an orgasm black orgasm
	Hot brazilzian tranny paolina gets drilled in her ass againt the couch in these hot wet cumming vids tranny cumming
	Horny teen in pink bikini Mia teasing us with her chubby arse in bedroom teen bikini gallery
	Mature bondage and spanking is the way to go wetsuit bondage
	Femdom Jane ties up her lesbian fuck toy and spanks her spank her
	Wild bondage babes fuck a submissive guy with a strap-on dick strap on bondage
	Chloe Camilla gets double teamed by hot blonde doms Lorelei Lee and Lily LaBeau with bondage. Electricity, and water! bondage galleries
	Gay hunks in BDSM suit does heavy ass pumping bdsm comics
	Horny lesbians enjoy hot ass spanking adult spanking

Related Video Collections

All Comments

Is there Bible passages that support a submissive husband / dominant wife relationship?
My marriage of almost 8 years has nearly been ruined by my faults as a pathological liar and adulterer-by-pornography.

Recently, I have been adopting a submissive lifestyle in which I prioritize fulfilling my wife's needs, and asking her permission from everything from spending money to taking a break from chores to watch TV with her (speaking of chores, I do them all around the house despite a full time job).

I do all this out of a desire to meet her needs because meeting mine has almost ended our marriage.

My problem is that the Bible overtly teaches that men are genetically engineered by God to be dominant (but considerate) and women are to submit to their husbands. This is not a bastardization. This is exactly what it says, I believe in 1 Peter 3.

That said, am I violating my Christian faith by being my wife's house slave? Is my joy in this endeavor the same false joy I received when watching porn?

Is it a sin to be my wife's submissive?

P.S. Per her request, this lifestyle is not reflected in the bedroom; this is the G-rated side of life I'm talking about, so no responses pertaining to sex.

No! omg you have it totally wrong! you really need to go to the church and have a 1 on 1 with the pastor. FAST!!

Is it sinfull for a good christian man to allow his wife to be dominant in their marriage?
In a manner of speaking, isn't a wife really the "property" of her husband? I don't mean in any sort of "master/slave" sense, just in a "Head of household" sort of way.

I mean there can only be one boss, right? What kind of man allows his wife to be in charge?

Any man who allows his wife to be dominant is a puss... a real man is in charge and never submissive. He's always right, too....

Where can I find a dominant husband?
I am an 18 year old American virgin. I want to give my virginity to my future husband, and I want to get married really soon. I don't want any higher education. I want to be provided for by a well paid, well educated husband who is 15-25 years older than me.
Just to get it clear: I am not interested in the S/M thing. I just want to be an obedient wife. I have never been interested in higher education and I have always wanted to be a homemaker. I am not attracted to boys at my age because they have no "natural authority" and masculinity. I want a physically strong, masculine, dominant man who can provide for me. I want to obey him all the time when he wants sex, food, massages or just some cuddly time. Don't get me wrong: I don't want to be a slave. I want to be a loving wife who puts his needs before mine. I find it romantic and sexy to be an obedient wife, who is provided for by a much stronger, more intelligent and successful man. I want an honest husband who tells me the truth and one that can teach me how to behave like a woman. I don't mind being scolded if he is not pleased. I think the reasons why husbands are cheating today is because the wives don't obey. Men need to feel possessive and protective towards their wives. It is part of evolution.
How can I find a successful husband with the same mindset as me? How can I find a man in his 30's or 40's who wants a young bride? Any suggestions? I am from a relatively small city (150 000 inhabitants). What do you think?

**yawns**

Americans do not use the word "inhabitants"... you are a lonely troll in India. You are not fooling anyone.

Are submissive women (submissive housewives) out performing many men in the business sector?
Are submissive women (submissive housewives) out performing many men in the business sector.

Submissive women. They were raised to think that the man is the head of the home and don't question anything he says. Therefore they don't talk or have hardly any type of confrontation.

Reason for this.

Should only say positive things about you (Husband).
Should never say/think anything negative about men.
Should never use sex as a weapon.
Should not have negative attitude towards traditional women’s responsibilities.
Should not have any personality disorders.
Should not have a snotty and superior attitude towards anything.
Should be financially responsible.
Should not try to prove anything to you and be preoccupied with fairness.
Should never try to control or change you.
Should never lay guilt on you and play mind games with you (husband).

Men are better in the business sector than dominant women (dominant wives).
Reason for this.

Most American women (dominant woman) have their own minds, their own ideas and aren't afraid to open their mouths and become successful with or without a man by their side.

1) Selfish - to the point where they don't know the difference between love of self and plain downright greed--and drilled into believing that whatever happens is the fault of whatever man is in their life because of the feminist crud drilled into them by the cadre of asexual closet cases called "therapists" who appear on "Ricki", "Oprah" or other such electronic drivel

2) Deluded - into thinking they "deserve" a rich, model-handsome husband who will "take them away from all of this"--whatever the "this" might be--and leading to resentment when they discover that the universe does NOT revolve around them

3) Angry - ALL the damn time about things which are so far out of their control as to be nonsensical--and constantly wanting to "discuss" this mind numbing drivel ad nauseam

4) Psychotic - multiple personalities in the same woman - as "Nomad" put it in the "Star Trek" episode: "Woman...a mass of inconsistencies...", and also when the feminist voices in their heads start with the regrets and victim acculturation

5) Worthless - anything that does not immediately resolve itself in her favor or to her benefit is meaningless to her, especially husband and family

6) Lazy - drilled into their head that they "deserve" a maid, nanny and personal slave to take care of every detail - and that their husband/boyfriend is REQUIRED to cater to their each and every mindless whim

7) Resentful - especially of other women who have things that they do not, in material, spiritual and esoteric senses

8) Greedy - to them, "housekeeping" means getting the house in the divorce (thanks to Zsa Zsa for that immortal line) and sucking the guy for every last cent, even if they had nothing to do with the building of the nest egg

9) Mindless - constant, irritating, idle prattle about topics they read about in some women's magazine and then become instant experts--particularly pop psychology and the latest crap they see on "Oprah" or "Ricki"

10) Vain - believing that they are irresistible to everything in pants and therefore are allowed to behave sluttish and without any honor.

Seriously I can't decide who you trying to insult more, house wives or working women. I am a stay at home mom of three guys and pregnant with #4, I home school my guys, help with our construction business, and have a custom jewelry business on the side. Ask my husband and he will tell you that I'm not some submissive drone that does his bidding. I love him and we work as a team, but he lives by the motto,"If mama ain't happy ain't nobody happy!" Get a life and get over you hatred of women in general.

Is this true for woman in general?
Are submissive woman (submissive wives) out perform many man in the business sector.

Men are better in the business sector than dominant woman (dominant wives). Dominate women have most of the listed below.

1) Selfish - to the point where they don't know the difference between love of self and plain downright greed--and drilled into believing that whatever happens is the fault of whatever man is in their life because of the feminist crud drilled into them by the cadre of asexual closet cases called "therapists" who appear on "Ricki", "Oprah" or other such electronic drivel

2) Deluded - into thinking they "deserve" a rich, model-handsome husband who will "take them away from all of this"--whatever the "this" might be--and leading to resentment when they discover that the universe does NOT revolve around them

3) Angry - ALL the damn time about things which are so far out of their control as to be nonsensical--and constantly wanting to "discuss" this mind numbing drivel ad nauseam

4) Psychotic - multiple personalities in the same woman - as "Nomad" put it in the "Star Trek" episode: "Woman...a mass of inconsistencies...", and also when the feminist voices in their heads start with the regrets and victim acculturation

5) Worthless - anything that does not immediately resolve itself in her favor or to her benefit is meaningless to her, especially husband and family

6) Lazy - drilled into their head that they "deserve" a maid, nanny and personal slave to take care of every detail - and that their husband/boyfriend is REQUIRED to cater to their each and every mindless whim

7) Resentful - especially of other women who have things that they do not, in material, spiritual and esoteric senses

8) Greedy - to them, "housekeeping" means getting the house in the divorce (thanks to Zsa Zsa for that immortal line) and sucking the guy for every last cent, even if they had nothing to do with the building of the nest egg

9) Mindless - constant, irritating, idle prattle about topics they read about in some women's magazine and then become instant experts--particularly pop psychology and the latest crap they see on "Oprah" or "Ricki"

10) Vain - believing that they are irresistible to everything in pants and therefore are allowed to behave sluttish and without any honor.

Not all women who are dominant are that way, and not all women who are submissive would be the opposite of those.

Do christian women they are impure?
Everything from the story of Lilith (who was booted out of Eden for having dominant sex with Adam) to how women are blamed for the fall from grace.

Genesis 3:16 Says that all women must suffer great pains during guy birth due to Eve eating the fruit of knowledge. (As if it is somehow just that humans should pay for their ancestor’s sins nor is a woman dying in labor some how befitting of a crime she did not commit.) The verse finishes of by saying a husband shall “rule” over his woman, stripping us off all power in between the sexes.

Genesis 19:8 Tells of a man named Lot who offers his daughters to a crowd of would be angel rapers. Later, Lot impregnates his own daughters after God kills his wife for simply looking back at the remains of her city.

Genesis 38:16-24 Tells a very interesting story of a man named Judah whom lived with his widowed daughter in law. His daughter in law was grieving and wearing the veils of mourning which Judah (a rather stupid man) mistook for the clothing of a prostitute. He ended up impregnating his daughter in law and she left the city. On a later date Judah sees the young woman again and demanded she be burned for being a prostitute (I like how only the woman is punished when THEY BOTH engaged in the sexual act). It wasn’t until Judah recognized the woman as his daughter in law and she was with his guy, that he decided not to kill her. Basically, Judah can commit incest, use a prostitute (in his mistaken perception), and impregnate a MUCH younger woman, yet he thinks she is the one deserving of death.

Exodus 21:3-4 Says that if a male slave is given a wife by his master (regardless of how long they are wed, how much they love each other or if they have guys) he can not leave servanthood with his wife or guyren. The woman and guyren are merely property of the master and their personal happiness or sanctity of family doesn’t matter.

Exodus 21:7 God not only sanctions selling ones daughter into slavery, but he also gives out laws on how it should be done.

Exodus 21:10 God ordains men taking several wives and even sets up laws as to how multiple wives should be handled.

Leviticus 12:1-8 Explains that a woman has to be purified after giving birth because she is “unclean”. It goes on to say that birthing a male is cleaner then birthing a female, hence a mother must purify TWICE as long when having a daughter. This is BLATANT sexism from the point of birth. A woman is dirty simply for being a woman; this is obviously very biased and chauvinistic.

Leviticus 15:19-30 Explains that a woman having her menstruation must be avoided to the point of not even touching what she has touched. It is quite curious that women are punished for simply having a biological function that “God” claims to have created. What is so just about vilifying what you created?

Leviticus 18:19 Goes onto say that even LOOKING at a menstruating woman is wrong.

Leviticus 19:20 Says that if a man has sex with a slave or betrothed woman he must then “scourge” her. Scourging is a term for a severe flogging or whipping. I find it quite curious that the woman shall be punished to the point of a beating for such an occurrence, yet the man gets to go free for the deed.

Leviticus 21:9 Explains that unchaste daughters of priests must be burnt to death. What about his unchaste sons? Of course this isn’t even answered in the Torah, we are to assume yet again that men have the power to do as they wish and a woman must suffer the punishment for BOTH of them.

Leviticus 27:3-7 God places a dollar value on human life; with women worth less than men.

Numbers 1:2 Is the basis for the sexism that remains rampant today. In this verse Moses takes a poll of all the men who are able to fight in war, women aren’t even counted in the census. Apparently back then, just like today, us women are considered the weaker species and unable to battle. (Let’s not forget that during the time the Pentateuch was written women in Pagan cultures were FEARED and revered as the more powerful species. It is because of this patriarchal religion and it’s offshoots that we have been reduced to cowering sub-humans.)

Numbers 30:3-16 A woman can’t make a vow unless her husband allows it.

Numbers 31: 14-18 Moses tells his men to kill all the males, non-virginal women, elderly and guyren of the Midianite tribe. Of course, the virgin women are kept for raping. If you read later down in the scripture God states that the Jews can not even marry a Midianite woman (with exception to Moses). Hence these women who were captured were repeatedly raped and impregnated and they weren’t even allowed a marital status in which to protect them.

Deuteronomy 20:13-15 Kill all the men and boys in the cities that God “delivers into your hands,” but keep the women for raping.

Deuteronomy 21:11-14 If you see a pretty woman among the captives then just take her home and “go in unto her.”

Deuteronomy 22:

Yes, the Bible was written by men and for men. It marginalizes women and guyren. Patriarchy is a curse on society. I just wish women would wise up, respect themselves, and quit supporting such garbage.

Why are cows so dangerous?
I was thinking on this because cows, you see, pretty much only think of food. From their earliest waking moments, they have their minds geared only to what food they can find; it is pretty much their dominant impulse.

This being the case, imagine this scenario:

Two cows in the field, minds focused on food, chewing their cud, watching Farmer Brown scurry about on his tasks. Now, the cows are used to Farmer Brown, but, being slaves to their quest for food, they look at him in a whole new light. One cow, eyeing the lanky farmer, nudges the other cow with its antlers, and gestures in the direction of Farmer Brown. The other cow, sizing up Farmer Brown, returns the first cow a knowing wink. Both cows begin ambling towards Farmer Brown at a leisurely pace.....

Farmer Brown pays the cows no mind; they are just dumb cows, to his thinking, and thus he unwittingly plays into the hooves of the prey-seeking cows. He hears a menacing moo behind him, and then all goes black.

Back at the farm house, Farmer Brown's wife is growing anxious; her husband should have been in from the fields hours ago, and his supper has long since grown cold. The neighbours come, and together they search the fields for Farmer Brown, but no trace of him is to be found, just two noticeably fatter cows......

You see, the fact that people think them dumb, docile creatures gives them a powerful stealthy edge! What else about cows makes them the menace that they are these days?

Babe I actually thought that you would write this as a blog.
I raise cattle. Its a little income on the side but actually I just love animals
The bull can sometimes be a bit intimidating but cows are really kind of good natured and shy
Cows used to scare me though. I think it is the unfamiliar that really frightens us

Women: Do you associate being in love with being submissive?
The reason I'm curious is because I've heard a few instances of women suggesting that being in love implies submissiveness, and I'm wondering how common it is.

In one case, I was reading a non-fiction book written by a female author. She was describing a good looking man she knew who for some reason became obsessed with the BDSM fetish, and she mentioned "He could have made any woman into his slave easily, as there are not many men with the face and body of Apollo."

Then I saw a question on here where a guy was asking something like "How do you get a woman to do whatever you say?" and a bunch of women responded with "That's easy, just get her to fall in love with you." It seemed as though they were implying that this was something common, something that all women would be able to understand.

Finally, when you watch interviews about the wives of senators who've stayed by their husbands through scandals and so on, the women seem like they really gave their all for the relationship and tolerated a lot from their husbands, often giving up their lives and dreams to make him happy. (Although those interviews are usually told from the woman's perspective, so they may not be completely unbiased.)

I find this strange, because most of the married women I know aren't submissive. If anything, they're the dominant ones in the relationship, and they usually talk down to their husbands a lot. Also, as a man, I've never associated being in love with being submissive, and it never occurred to me that women would. Certainly you cherish the person and want to do everything to make them happy and if they're ever hurt it hurts you, but there's no feeling of wanting to do whatever they say.

So my question is is this genuinely something that women view differently from men, or are these all just coincidences that have made me confused?

If you learn just a little bit about the BDSM lifestyle, you will quickly realize the answer to your question. Just because someone is classified as a "submissive", does not mean they are submissie in the sense that you are thinking. Yes, submisiveness usually comes hand in hand with love, but as any true sub that has experience with BDSM will tell you that the Master has to submit just as much as the sub.

The submissive has control over many things, one such example being stating her limits.

So yes, in most traditional relationships the woman is submissive in a way when she falls in love but don't confuse submissiveness and control, as the two are not interchangeable.

History Review Questions help?
Need help with a COUPLE of multiple choice questions

1. which of the following was an important demographic change that occurred between 1415 and 1750?
a. New navigational inventions made sea travel on the Atlantic Ocean more practical.
b. Native populations in the Americas were decimated by disease contracted from Europeans
c. social mobility increased as new opportunities opened in the Western Hemisphere.
d. Absolute gov. proved to be much less effective than constitutional monarchies
e. the overall population of the African continent decreased significantly because of the slave trade to the Americas.

2. An economic innovation that first developed between 1450 and 1750 was
a. the banking system
reinsurance underwriting
c. paper money
d. gold coins
e. joint-stock companies

3. Which of the following accurately describes European cultural influence in sub Saharan Africa between 1450 and 1750?
a. European culture influence grew substantially during the period
b. European culture influence was felt in only a few areas
c. European culture influence decreased significantly during this period
d. European culture influence grew gradually but steadily, although it did not threaten the influence of Islam
e. European culture influence remained steady, as Islamic cultural influence declined.

4.One reason Zheng He's voyage had only a limited impact on the course of world history is that they
a. made use of few advanced navigational technologies
b. changed trade patterns in the eastern hemisphere

5. Settlement patterns in the Cape Colony were different from those in most of the rest of the sub-Saharan Africa in that Europeans...
a. coexisted on equal footing with natives
b. did not come in very large numbers
c. came as traders only
d. were more interested in gold than slaves
e. moved inland from the coast

6. Which of the following accurately compares the Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal Empires?
a. The dominant religion in all three was Sunnui Islam
b. The Mughals had a powerful navy, but the ottomans and safavid did not
c. the 3 empires fought with the empires outside the region, but generally had few quarrels with one another
d. all reached their peak of power in the 16th and 17th centuries, and were declined by 1750
e. The ottomans and Mughals benefited from the large amounts of silver form the new world in the trade networks but the safavids did not

7. In the Ottoman, Safavid, & Mughal Empires the social structure allowed women
a. to have no influence over their husbands
b. in the lower classes to move about freely
c. who were wives of rulers to play key political roles
d. of the upper classes to repudiate purdah or seclusion
e. to compete with the men in the business world with relative equality

8. An important move taken by the mughal leader Akbar was to..
a. establish Sufi control of gov
b. ban rajas , or regional leader from the highest positions in the bureaucracy
c. establish the jizra, or head tax, for non Muslims
d. endorse the Hindu practice of sati or suicide of widows
e. encourage intermarriage between mughal aristocracy and the families of the Hindu raj put

9. All of the following were accomplishments of Peter the Great EXCEPT:
a. into of western military technology
b. extension of more freedoms to women
c. appointment of bureaucrats based on merit
d. establishment of long term Russian access to the Black sea
e. construction of new roads and bridges

10.The Jesuit missionaries sought to impress the Chinese emperor's court with European
a. technology
b. textiles and jewelry
c. knowledge and philosophy
d. pottery and silk
e. military might

11.One difference between Ming and Quing rulers of China was that Quing rulers
a. de-emphasized the civil service examinations
b encouraged intermarriage between Manchu and Chinese
c. Decenteralized government controlled
d.. Were considered to be outsiders by Confucian scholars
e. were generally not as well educated

12. Which of the following is an accurate comparison of Quing China and Tokugawa Japan?
a. The quing emperor ruled china: japan did not have an emperor
b. the literacy rates in japan were higher than those in china
c. Tokugawa japan was more tolerant of European missionaries
d. Quing china was less open to trade with other regions
e. Tokugawa Japan's economy was healthier than Quing China's economy

13. In the era from 1450 to 1750 Russia changed significantly through
a. expansion and centralization of government powers
extension of political power to a working parliament
c. modernization of its economic systems by abolishing serfdom
d. reinforcement of the rights of boyars and other aristocrats
e. the establishment of schools that provided education for all

*even answering one will help so much thank you*

Answer to question no.8 is [e]...

Answer to question no.6 is[a]....

I think I would be perfect for this.

I already know every submission hold known to man and really enjoy making others feel pain.

Call me!

-Batman